Home » Activism » Privacy, Freedom & Human Rights » Christopher Monckton | Caught Promoting US-style Fox News Network To Benefit The Australian Mining Industry

Christopher Monckton | Caught Promoting US-style Fox News Network To Benefit The Australian Mining Industry

Written by Andrew Puhanic
Published on Saturday, February 4th, 2012
Globalist Report

Christopher Monckton Promotes Fox News TV To AustraliansBritish politician Christopher Monckton has been caught red handed advising mining industry insiders how to create a US-style Fox News channel in Australia, supported by the “super wealthy” in order to provide supportive coverage for the mining industry.

The following video, filmed in the boardrooms of pro-mining organisation Mannkal Economic Education Foundation, shows Mr Monckton offering to work with commentators such as Andrew Bolt to establish the channel.

Although Christopher Monckton has been an advocate against the globalists and their lies in the past, from an Australian perspective, this incident is something that is totally unacceptable. All a “Fox News” style network would do to the Australian media landscape would be to create another avenue for the liberal party to push it’s agenda. Yes, the ABC and the Fairfax media outlets are leftist,  but the balance created by the News Limited networks provides Australians with a balance that is “slightly” acceptable. What Australia needs is more Alternative News networks.

I’ve watched many Fox News programs and our own Andrew Bolt is enough. Imageine Andrew Bolt, Bill O’Reilly and former presenter Glen Beck on the same show?

Please, send this video to all your friend and family.

  • Jeremy Lynes

    I like Monckton’s moxie in facing down the AGW scam, but what he advocates here is fraud. Diogenes would be disappointed.

  • Damian Lataan

    I’m all for vigourous debate on how to make the world a better place, but, frankly, Bolt and Co are only interested in warmongering, monoculturalism, making the rich even richer at everyones elses expense, perpetuating pollution, hating anything non-white and non-Western and generally ensuring that governments give non-white refugees a hard time. Free speech is one thing; abusing it in order to peddle hatred and to villify whole groups of people he dislikes is something else.

    • leo killigrew

      Damian is for “vigo(u)ous” debate – then launches into a personal diatribe against Bolt who he alleges is “only interested in warmongering, monoculturalism etc etc etc.
      (Seems well briefed in all the Leftist clap trap that substitutes for debate…?)

      This issue is about FREE SPEECH without abuse, or hatred or contempt.
      Why is it that when that right is exercised to criticise the Left position we get an immediate ‘ad hominem’ response ?
      Bolt’s criticisms deserve to be considered in a logical and factual manner.